• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Cohen Ziffer Frenchman & McKenna

Policyholders’ Heaviest Hitters | Attorneys | New York

  • Team
  • News/Insights
  • Services
  • About
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • Team
  • News/Insights
  • Services
  • About
  • Careers
  • Offices

Stay Connected
Michelle R. Migdon
Main image for Michelle R. Migdon

Michelle R. Migdon

Partner

mmigdon@cohenziffer.com
New York
212.584.1825 D
Print PDF Email

My Approach

My biggest strength as an attorney is my meticulous, detail-oriented approach to complex analysis. I always delve deeply to uncover and consider all the possible issues, searching beyond the obvious to find creative approaches. In many cases, crafting novel arguments yields optimal results for my clients.

Overview

In her national insurance litigation practice, Michelle Migdon represents policyholders in their most challenging recovery and coverage matters. Michelle’s cases generally contain a common denominator: clients have suffered a significant loss and enlist her to get back in their pockets money owed from the insurance company . With 20 years of experience in this area, she has a wealth of knowledge and rarely sees an issue she hasn’t encountered previously. Michelle’s long litigation and insurance background allows her to astutely help clients look ahead to avoid future disputes, but also to fight back when necessary.

Michelle represents clients in a full spectrum of matters, including claims relating to first party property and business interruption, commercial general liability, credit risk, builders risk, and fiduciary liability issues. She’s particularly adept at handling insurance disputes involving claims-made directors and officers, errors and omissions, and professional liability policies. Michelle also advocates in lawsuits seeking to obtain substantial insurance recoveries for losses arising out of multi-billion-dollar settlements of class action and other litigation involving alleged securities law violations, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty claims.

In addition, Michelle addresses coverage issues of importance to policyholders, including the effect of settlements with underlying insurers on exhaustion of underlying coverage limits, the scope and application of a fraud exclusion, compliance with cooperation and consent to settle provisions, allocation of loss among covered and uncovered parties and claims, claims for rescission based on allegedly material misrepresentations, and the sufficiency of a notice of circumstances.

Pre-litigation advising on claims comprises a substantive part of Michelle’s practice. In this capacity she takes steps to convince insurance companies to agree to settlement, using methods such as letter-writing, negotiation, and mediation. She also ensures that clients are keeping their carriers properly informed about the settlement status throughout the process.

But at the same time, if an insurance company will not cave, Michelle is prepared to litigate through summary judgment and trial to help her clients achieve the insurance recoveries to which they are entitled. Accordingly, Michelle has litigated and secured victories in many precedent-setting insurance coverage cases in trial and appellate courts throughout the country.

Michelle enjoys helping organizations overcome their insurance-related financial challenges and finds it intellectually gratifying to put puzzle pieces together to solve their problems. As an attorney who possesses superb brief-writing skills and a keen ability to thoroughly master the facts of cases, she is highly effective in developing the arguments and strategies that best serve those she represents.

Experience Highlights

  • Michelle represented TIAA-CREF in an insurance coverage lawsuit seeking reimbursement from the client’s professional liability insurers of more than $60 million. Michelle obtained summary judgment on a groundbreaking issue by securing coverage for a settlement of a civil disgorgement claim and then secured a favorable jury verdict on remaining issues. The Delaware Supreme Court ultimately affirmed that TIAA-CREF was entitled to recover 100 percent of its defense costs as reasonable and necessary.

    Read More
  • In disputes involving Enron Corp. and Worldcom, Michelle successfully advocated for client JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries in claims for bankers’ professional liability coverage in connection with its settlement of class.

    Read More

Relevant Experience

  • Representation of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA), College Retirement Equities Fund (CREF), and other related entities (collectively, TIAA-CREF) in an insurance coverage lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court seeking reimbursement from TIAA-CREF’s professional liability insurers of more than $60 million for the defense and settlement of class action lawsuits relating to delays in processing account holders’ transfer requests in certain investment accounts. Obtained a landmark decision from President Judge Jan Jurden granting summary judgment to TIAA-CREF on October 20, 2016, finding that a civil settlement of a lawsuit involving claims for disgorgement was an insurable loss under New York law, see 2016 WL 6534271 (Del. Super. Oct. 20, 2016), and secured a verdict on December 12, 2016, after a six-day jury trial, finding that one insurer waived its consent to settle defense and that TIAA-CREF was entitled to recover 100 percent of its defense costs as reasonable and necessary. The decision was affirmed by the Delaware Supreme Court on July 30, 2018. 
  • Representation of Verizon Communications Inc. in an insurance coverage lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court seeking reimbursement under executive and organization liability insurance policies for tens of millions of dollars in defense costs that Verizon and a former officer/director incurred in successfully defending against lawsuits arising out of securities-related transactions entered into in connection with Verizon’s divestiture of certain directories businesses. In a March 2017 decision, the court granted summary judgment to Verizon, dismissing the insurers’ defense that the underlying lawsuit did not constitute a “Securities Claim” as defined in their policies, see 2017 WL 1149118 (Del. Super. March 2, 2017). 
  • Represented Syracuse University in a claim for coverage under a Not-For-Profit Individual and Organization Insurance Policy. In March 2013, the university was awarded summary judgment for costs it incurred responding to and conducting an investigation in connection with a number of state and federal grand jury subpoenas concerning facts and circumstances relating to allegations of sexual abuse, and in particular the allegations against the University’s former associate basketball coach. In December 2013, New York’s Appellate Division, 4th Department, unanimously affirmed the trial court’s summary judgment ruling. 
  • Represented Signal Products Inc., a handbag manufacturer, in a lawsuit seeking defense cost coverage and bad faith damages from its commercial liability insurer relating to an underlying intellectual property and trade dress action brought against various fashion entities and licensees by a brand name company. In a favorable summary judgment opinion by the Central District of California, the firms' lawyers secured a landmark ruling, finding that California’s statute providing for the appointment of independent counsel by the insured where there is conflict with its insurer does not limit the insured to obtaining payment for defense counsel from only one law firm. 
  • Represented a major New York City real estate owner and developer that incurred property damage and time element losses at multiple downtown office buildings as a result of Superstorm Sandy. 
  • Represented JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries in claims for bankers’ professional liability coverage in connection with its settlement of class action lawsuits arising out of the financial, banking, and other professional services it provided to Enron. Among other issues in the case, the Appellate Division, First Department, rendered a favorable decision, finding that the policyholder’s notice of potential claims that might be brought against it concerning Enron was sufficiently detailed to bring subsequent Enron-related claims into the insurance coverage in place at the time the notice was sent. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. The Travelers Indemnity Co., et al., Index No. 600674/06, Supreme Court, New York County. See 73 A.D.3d 9 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 2010). 
  • Represented JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries in claims for bankers professional liability coverage in connection with its settlement of class action lawsuits arising out of its underwriting of WorldCom bonds. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. AIU Ins. Co, et. al., Index No. 601904/06, Supreme Court, New York County. 
  • Represented JPMorgan Chase & Co., as successor to Bank One Corporation, in claims for bankers’ professional liability insurance in connection with its settlement of multidistrict litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty claims by owners of NCFE bonds. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co., et al., Index No. 603766/08, Supreme Court, New York County. 
  • Represented the scaffolding contractor for the construction site at Four Times Square in New York City in an appeal to the Second Circuit to enforce an insurance company’s waiver of subrogation rights under a builder’s risk policy. After the insurer paid the property owner for property loss claims, the insurer, as subrogee, sued the contractor to recover the amounts it had paid, alleging gross negligence in the construction and installation of the scaffolding. In an important decision, in favor of the contractor, the Second Circuit held that the public policy of the state of New York does not prohibit waivers of subrogation with respect to gross negligence claims where the parties to a construction contract have agreed to insure such losses as part of their risk allocation agreement and where the injured party is not deprived of compensation for its loss. See St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Universal Builders Supply, Inc., 409 F.3d 73 (2d Cir. 2005). 
  • Represented Lucent Technologies Inc., a major telecommunications company, in an arbitration seeking recovery of credit risk insurance payments for defaulted loans issued to its customers prior to the collapse of the telecommunications market, which loans were insured pursuant to a trust arrangement. 
  • Represented Silverstein Properties Inc., the lessee of the World Trade Center, in its insurance claim for property and business interruption losses following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Recognition and Rankings

Recognized by The Legal 500 US for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders, 2020

Community and Professional Activities

Member, The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Committee on Insurance Law, 2010-2013

News/Insights

  • Cohen Ziffer Lawyers Score High Marks in The Legal 500 (US) 2020 Edition

    June 22, 2020·News·less than a minute
  • Cohen Ziffer Lawyers Secure One of the Largest Verdicts Against Protective Life Insurance Policy in Alabama

    September 25, 2018·News·less than a minute
  • Media Coverage: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms $40 Million+ Coverage Win for TIAA

    August 1, 2018·News·less than a minute
  • Delaware Supreme Court Affirms $40 Million+ Coverage Win for TIAA – It Rules Settlement of Civil Disgorgement Claims Insurable Under New York Law

    July 31, 2018·News·2 minute read
  • Cushman & Wakefield Secures More Than $48 Million in Coverage for Appraisal Litigation

    April 26, 2018·News·less than a minute
  • Law360: Cohen Ziffer Lawyers Secure $48 Million in Coverage for Verizon for Securities Transaction Claims

    March 15, 2017·News·less than a minute
  • Law360: Retirement Provider’s Disgorgement Is Insurable, Judge Says

    November 3, 2016·News·less than a minute

Primary Sidebar

  • My Approach
  • Overview
  • Experience Highlights
  • Relevant Experience
  • Recognition and Rankings
  • Community and Professional Activities
  • News/Insights

Education

  • New York University School of Law (JD, magna cum laude, 1997)

    Order of the Coif

  • Duke University (AB, magna cum laude, 1994)

Bar Admissions

  • New York

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
© 2025 Cohen Ziffer Frenchman & McKenna
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok